From: vera@fanaraaken.Stanford.EDU (James S. Vera) Subject: Re: Your SLIP is showing... (I wish) Date: 14 Feb 1993 04:13:53 GMT
oreillym@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Michael O'Reilly) writes:
>CHRISTIAN D. ARMOUR (cs911461@ariel.yorku.ca) wrote:
>:
>:
>: Greets,
>:
>:
>: As I have pretty much given up on ever getting term to work (a terrible
>: shame but the docs are pretty bad :-( ), I'm now looking for a version
>I am crushed. Could you please mail me instead of talking to approx
>46,000 (I think?) of whom about 2000 have even heard of term. :)
I'd like to put in a good word for term. I'm using it every day and
find it _very_ handy. Those who don't know term and want SLIP-like
functionality should check it out.
One question: How does the traffic carried running txconn and X
clients remotely compate with the traffic one would get running SLIP
and running X clients remotely? Enquiring minds need to know!
James S. Vera | Internet | Voice: +1.415.723.1089
Stanford University | vera@anna.stanford.edu | FAX: +1.415.725.7398