From: SSB1PZP@imcvms.med.navy.mil (PERUCCI, PHILIP A.) Subject: Re: which is better: Slackware or SLS Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 00:41:06 GMT
In <CBItKD.I5q@ns1.nodak.edu> person@plains.NoDak.edu writes:
>
> Slackware wins hands down. As I recall, i had to have lots of help
> installing SLS. The guy who helped me install SLS is the same
> guy who produced the Slackware distribution.
>
> If you want Xfree to work right the FIRST time, get Slackware. I had no end
> of problems getting X up and going with SLS. Pat had to figure that one out
> for me too.
> God, I feel like I'm writting a Jerry Pournelle column here.
> --
> Brett Person
> Guest Account
> North Dakota State University
> person@plains.nodak.edu || person@plains.bitnet
Does Slackware work well with SCSI and tcp/ip? More to the point,
1) Is the Adaptec 1542B supported?
2) Net 2?
3) Which NICs are supported WITHOUT re-compiling kernel? If 3C503
is one, is it compiled for AUI or thin-net?
===========================================================================
Phil Perucci, Systems Programmer | "I don't speak for any organization
ssb1pzp@imcvms.med.navy.mil | and no organization speaks for me"
===========================================================================