From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Linux/386bsd on a diskless workstation Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1993 23:56:15 GMT
In article <1993Apr28.020740.27332@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
> This is *very* different from the suggestion that (to put it bluntly) some
> sort of half-assed support should be rigged to allow something like a
> Diamond Speedstar to work without the manufacturer having to stoop to
> acknowledging the existance of something other than DOS.
But it doesn't bother you to set up some half-assed support to allow Novell
to ignore anything but DOS... and now Unixware?
> The reason behind propritary interfaces in the DOS market is to allow a
> company to compete in a given market with an inferior product...
If it's an inferior product why are people buying it?
-- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Har du kramat din varg idag? 'U` "Det er min ledsager, det er ikke drikkepenge."