From: robin@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Rob Rainton) Subject: Re: 16550 uarts and .99pl8 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1993 19:44:35 GMT
In article <C5y9y2.GAw@world.std.com> nigel%gamble@uunet.UU.NET writes:
>I don't have any problems with 0.99pl8 and my 16550A. But I recently
>read over in comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware that the difference between a
>16550 and a 16550 is that the 16550 has a bug in the FIFO which can.....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ermmm, which one has the bug?
:-), Rob