From: Adam Goldberg (adam@microware.com)
Date: 04/21/93


From: adam@microware.com (Adam Goldberg)
Subject: Re: Intel, the Pentium and Linux
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 13:13:07 GMT

jahoward@iastate.edu (Jim) writes:

>In <1r0tqkINNr18@s850.mwc.edu> bfornshe@s850.mwc.edu (Ben J Fornshell) writes:

>>the 386. Also its supposed to be able to handle two integer processes
>>simultaneously, though its floating point rating is supposed to
>>(relatively speaking) stink. The only real problem the 586/P5s have is

>Well, everything I have read about the P5 chip (including private
>reviews) points to a much greater improved floating point unit. In fact,
>in nearly every test, the floating unit was 5(five) times FASTER than the
>DX2/66

>The integer stuff was about twice the speed of a dx/66. The test I
>am quoting was in PC World, and it was run on the 60mhz Pentium.

Aha! There's the problem--you're comparing against a 486. The
Pentium FPU is slow _when_compared_to_other_64-bit_processors (Alpha,
for instance).

Adam

-- 
Adam G.
adamg@microware.com, or ...!uunet!mcrware!adamg
The above is not to be construed in any way as the official or unofficial
statements of Microware, or any Microware employees.