From: sweh.womble@spuddy.UUCP (Stephen Harris) Subject: number of articles Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1993 10:27:23 GMT
In article <1904@dsbc.icl.co.uk> mat@dsbc.icl.co.uk writes:
> In article <2776@ozz.oasis.icl.co.uk> cwa@oasis.icl.co.uk (Chris Adams) writes:
> >Yep, gets my vote.
{Various potential groups listed}
> I think X & gcc would be either covered by the X & gcc news groups themselves
> or could go under comp.os.linux... Comp.os.linux could stay as it is (a misc
> type group) although the future splitting of this should be in order.
>
> Any more splits ?!
Please shut up.
Go away.
Forget about this topic.
We had a VOTE on splitting comp.os.linux a little while ago. It was voted
NO.
Any further discussion at this stage is pointless, useless, and just adds to
the traffic. A further CFD, RFV etc can not be done under Usenet guidelines
for a few more months yet.
Read the regular posting "**** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING ***", from which
I quote:
+++++
Splitting the group: It's been tried, and all the new groups except .announce
failed. It can't be tried again within 6 months. See news.announce.newgroups.
=====
Obviously people don't "read this before posting". Sheesh.
Stephen Harris
sweh.womble@spuddy.uucp ...!uknet!axion!spuddy!sweh.womble
* Meow! Call Spuddy the Cat for Usenet access in the UK. Call 0203 364436 *