From: hodgen@infko.uni-koblenz.de Subject: Re: SPEED comparisons of ET4000 cards. Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 09:22:41 GMT
In article <KETIL.92Sep28212034@spurv.ii.uib.no> ketil@ii.uib.no writes:
>In article <1992Sep28.055653.5428@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> feoh@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Chris Patti) writes:
>
> I would consider buying an ATI Ultra as I think performance
> is better due to the built in Blitter, etc, however relatively
> flawless Xwindows operation is my main goal (aside from the
> animation I mentioned above) so unless 8514 support has been
> integrated into the server or at least stabilized I'll stick with
> an ET4000.
>
>Yeah, this one did well in the test. It also has built in
>anti-aliasing, which would be nice. I think there is a 8514 X11, but
>I don't know for sure.
These cards are great! But if you've got a crappy monitor don't bother (but
that applies to all hi res cards). The X11 8514 server exists and works very
nicely thank you. I've been using it for 3 weeks now and have had no problems
with it.
Bye.
-- Wayne Hodgen | hodgen@infko.uni-koblenz.de | Opinions (c) Me 1991 | Intel SX Uni Koblenz, | (..!unido!infko!hodgen) | Keeper of the Scrolls, | Just Rheinau 3-4, | Voice: +49 261 9119-645 | Defender of the Net, | say 5400 Koblenz. | Fax: +49 261 9119-499 | His name is "root". | NO!!!