From: Wayne Davison (davison@borland.com)
Date: 09/18/92

Next message: Jong Y. Lee: "Diamond speedstar and X"
Previous message: Roger Binns: "Re: Gnu hardware"
Maybe in reply to: Jonathan Badger: "Berkeley Signals - a substitue under Linux?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: davison@borland.com (Wayne Davison)
Subject: Re: Berkeley Signals - a substitue under Linux?
Date: 18 Sep 1992 09:31:07 GMT

badger@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Jonathan Badger) wrote:
> what is a good substitute for Berekeley
> signal calls not implemented under Linux (or any POSIX system, I believe?)

Check the 4.1 release of the libraries/include files. You should be able
to #define _USE_BSD_SIGNAL before including <signal.h> to use the bsd-style
signal handlers. I'm not sure if some functions are still missing, however.

-- 
Wayne Davison
davison@borland.com

Next message: Jong Y. Lee: "Diamond speedstar and X"
Previous message: Roger Binns: "Re: Gnu hardware"
Maybe in reply to: Jonathan Badger: "Berkeley Signals - a substitue under Linux?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]