From: vds7789@aw2.fsl.ca.boeing.com (Vincent D. Skahan) Subject: Re: Smail (from Mailpak 1.3) won't compile Date: 16 Oct 1992 13:43:39 GMT
erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp) writes:
>Vince Skahan (vince@halcyon.com) wrote:
>: Incidentally, the Taylor uucp 'smail3' is *NOT* smail3.1 !
>: It's smail2.5, which is from about 1987. It's pretty simple to
>: get the 'real' smail3.1.28 to compile under Linux.
>:
>smail-3.1.28 will be included in mailpak-1.4, which will be released as soon as
>taylor-uucp 1.04 gets out of beta. Currently, everything works except the
>bidirectional 'i' protocol.
thanks Ed!!!!
>I'm considering asking Ted to make space on tsx-11 for mailpak, so people can
>get the pieces they need - I've got cnews up and running, as well as elm-2.4,
>taylor-uucp 1.04, and smail-3.1.28.
well, last night I put together the long rumored (threatened?) 'newspak 1.0'
which I'll try to upload this weekend to tsx-11 and sunsite. At this time
it contains the following:
- Cnews
- tin1.1pl4
- trn2.2
All in source form with proper config files and sources already patched
(if needed, with README.linux's) and ready to compile under gcc2.2.2d/jump4.1
I have all the above running at home totally automated, with the mail
functionality provided by 'mailpak 1.3' versions of elm2.3pl11 and Taylor
uucp 1.03
Lastly, if anybody has 'nn' running under linux, please get in touch
with me via email at home (vince@victrola.sea.wa.us)...
-- --------- Vince Skahan -------- vds7789@aw2.fsl.ca.boeing.com ------- No matter how peaceful our little patch of life might be, somewhere, at the exact same moment, there is an ongoing scene of almost incomprehensible madness... - Doonesbury