From: hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin N9ITP) Subject: Re: 0.95 problems Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1992 20:03:31 GMT
In article <1992Mar10.151526.17137@athena.mit.edu> of alt.os.linux,
EINSTEIN@plh.af.mil (DAVE EINSTEIN) writes:
>
> Another question. Is the device numbering the same as in 0.12,
> i.e. is /dev/hdb2 -> 0x307 ?
>
No. That is also why the naming scheme changed.
Form an earlier post:
/dev/hda0 -> 0x0301
/dev/hda1 -> 0x0302
/dev/hda2 -> 0x0303
/dev/hda3 -> 0x0304
/dev/hda4 -> 0x0305 (Extended partitions...)
/dev/hdb0 -> 0x0341
/dev/hdb1 -> 0x0342
/dev/hdb2 -> 0x0343
/dev/hdb3 -> 0x0344
/dev/hdb4 -> 0x0345 (Extended partitions...)
Someone please flame me if I remembered it wrong...
/hpa
-- INTERNET: hpa@nwu.edu TALK: hpa@casbah.acns.nwu.edu BITNET: HPA@NUACC HAM RADIO: N9ITP, SM4TKN FIDONET: 1:115/989.4 NeXTMAIL: hpa@lenny.acns.nwu.edu "Northwestern: our labs have tube transistor-curve tracers."