From: hlu@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu) Subject: Re: recompiling 0.96a with gcc 2.11c Date: 15 Jun 1992 08:21:33 GMT
In article <BpvFBp.JBF@news.cso.uiuc.edu> thoth@uiuc.edu (Ben Cox) writes:
>cole@concert.net (Derrick C. Cole) writes:
>
>>>gcc -c -o string.o string.c
>>>gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
>>>make: *** [string.o] Error 1
>
>>Would someone kindly answer this question? I'm having the same problem.
>
>I think the problem has to do with the fact that I replaced the
>/usr/src/linux/include/{linux,sys} directories with symlinks to
>/usr/include/{linux,sys}, which I had gotten from the
Why? In those docs of gcc 2.11c, I said REMOVE "-nostdinc -Iinclude"
stuffs in kernel Makefiles. Please don't do ANY symlinks.
>0.96ainclude.tar.Z file in the GCC 2.11c directory.
>
>I reinstalled my linux base source, copied its include files OVER the
>ones in /usr/include, and remade the links. If you're using the GCC
>2.11c 0.96aincludes, try this. Maybe H.J. can shed some light on what
>the correct usage of them is?
0.96ainc.tar.Z is for 0.96a ONLY, no pacthes are applied. I have made
0.96ap2inc.tar.Z for 0.96a patch level 2. But it has to be used with
gcc 2.2 which I postpone to release to public due to a bug in libc.a.
Somebody is wokring on that bug. I will release gcc 2.2 (2.2.2) once
that bug is fixed.
H.J.