From: Just dance and move your body (opium@hardy.u.washington.edu)
Date: 12/13/92
- Next message: Phil Howard : "Re: Colorado Tape drive support?"
- Previous message: Spaggie: "X runs correctly under .98 but not .98PL5 (Is this a bug?)"
- Next in thread: Bruce Jackson: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Bruce Jackson: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Bill Bogstad: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Juan Rodriguez-Sero: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Operator: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
From: opium@hardy.u.washington.edu (Just dance and move your body)
Subject: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99
Date: 14 Dec 1992 04:38:06 GMT
It could just be me but after I booted the new Image Itried ps -U to update:
Neltrix# ps -U
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
Neltrix#
It doesn't seem to work ;; However free and who are okay.
also, when I run top, the screen is blank until I hit q, then it exits.
Has anybody been able to fix this, or has anybody experienced similar be-
havior?
Thanx for listening 8-)
- Next message: Phil Howard : "Re: Colorado Tape drive support?"
- Previous message: Spaggie: "X runs correctly under .98 but not .98PL5 (Is this a bug?)"
- Next in thread: Bruce Jackson: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Bruce Jackson: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Bill Bogstad: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Juan Rodriguez-Sero: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Reply: Operator: "Re: PS, top, vs. linux-0.99"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]